For manufacturers and distributors, few issues have created more uncertainty over the past two years than U.S. trade policy. While tariffs have long served as a tool of industrial and geopolitical policy, the pace of change during 2025 and 2026 has forced businesses to continually reevaluate sourcing strategies, pricing models, inventory management, and capital investment decisions. As the industry approaches the 2026 midterm elections, the central question is no longer whether tariffs matter. Rather, it is whether the current trade environment represents a temporary period of disruption or the emergence of a more permanent shift in U.S. economic policy. The answer increasingly appears to be the latter.
The Current Tariff Landscape
The current tariff landscape differs significantly from the environment manufacturers faced prior to 2025. Following a series of executive actions, legal challenges, and subsequent policy revisions, the United States remains in a substantially higher-tariff environment than existed only a few years ago. By several estimates, the effective U.S. tariff rate rose dramatically from roughly 2% in 2024 to as high as 15% during late 2025 before settling near 10% following court rulings and revised trade measures in 2026. Although certain tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) were invalidated by the U.S. Supreme Court in February 2026, many duties were subsequently replaced through other statutory authorities, including Sections 301 and 232 of U.S. trade law.
One notable development in 2026 was the refund of certain tariffs that had been collected under IEEPA. As a result, importers became entitled to refunds for tariffs previously paid under the invalidated measures, and various economic and legal analyses estimated that approximately $166 billion of tariff collections could be refunded during fiscal 2026. While these refunds provided a significant cash flow benefit to affected importers, manufacturers, and distributors, the broader economic impact has been more muted than some initially expected. Many companies had already absorbed the higher costs through reduced margins, customer price increases, sourcing changes, or inventory decisions made months earlier. Consequently, the refunds generally improved liquidity and profitability for eligible importers but did not fully reverse the operational and pricing adjustments that businesses had implemented. Moreover, because many of the vacated tariffs were subsequently replaced by alternative trade measures imposed under different statutory authorities, the refund program has not resulted in a return to the relatively low-tariff environment that existed prior to 2025.
For manufacturing and distribution companies, the practical consequence is that tariffs remain embedded within the cost structure of many supply chains. Steel and aluminum products continue to face some of the highest effective duty rates, while numerous products sourced from China remain subject to Section 301 tariffs initially implemented during the first Trump administration and largely maintained by subsequent administrations. The U.S. International Trade Commission continues to maintain extensive product lists subject to these duties, and many of the strategic-sector increases announced in recent years have now taken effect.
Why Tariffs Have Become a Long-Term Business Issue
Importantly, tariff policy has evolved from a narrowly focused trade dispute into a broader industrial policy instrument. Both Republican and Democratic administrations have demonstrated a willingness to use tariffs to address concerns related to domestic manufacturing capacity, strategic supply chains, national security, and geopolitical competition, particularly with China. As a result, many observers who once viewed tariffs as temporary now increasingly view them as a structural feature of the U.S. manufacturing landscape. The durability of Section 301 tariffs is perhaps the clearest example. Originally enacted in 2018, they remain in force today and, in several strategic industries, have expanded over time rather than contracted.
Tariff Impact on Manufacturers & Distributors
The effect on manufacturers has been mixed. Domestic producers competing directly against imported goods have generally benefited from reduced foreign price competition. At the same time, manufacturers reliant on imported raw materials, components, or finished goods have often experienced margin compression as higher import costs work their way through the supply chain. Industry participants have increasingly responded by diversifying suppliers, nearshoring production, and carrying additional inventory to mitigate policy risk. These actions may improve resilience, but they frequently come with increased operating costs and lower efficiency than highly optimized global supply chains.
Distributors face a somewhat different challenge. Unlike manufacturers that may eventually benefit from domestic production incentives, distributors frequently have limited ability to alter the origin of products they sell. Consequently, they often find themselves managing customer resistance to price increases while simultaneously absorbing higher landed costs. Recent industry analysis suggests that tariffs are no longer viewed as temporary disruptions but rather as recurring operational realities that require ongoing contract management, pricing adjustments, and sourcing evaluations.
Inflation & the Broader Economic Impact
From a macroeconomic perspective, tariffs have also contributed to ongoing inflationary pressures. The Federal Reserve noted in its July 2026 Monetary Policy Report that tariff increases were among the factors pushing inflation higher during 2025 and into 2026. Research published by both the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis and the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis similarly concluded that tariffs have contributed measurably to consumer price inflation, particularly within imported goods categories such as vehicles, furniture, and electronics. While recent reductions in certain tariff rates have moderated those effects, the inflationary impact has not fully disappeared.
What Could the Midterm Elections Mean for Trade Policy?
As attention turns toward the 2026 midterm elections, many business leaders are asking whether a significant policy reversal should be expected. At present, the available evidence does not support that conclusion.
Political analysts generally expect trade policy to remain highly visible during the election cycle because of its direct connection to affordability, inflation, domestic employment, and manufacturing competitiveness. However, neither party appears to be advocating a wholesale return to the low-tariff trade environment that existed before 2018. Instead, the debate has increasingly shifted toward questions of scope, implementation, and economic impact rather than whether tariffs should exist at all. Even where policymakers disagree on specific measures, there appears to be broad acceptance of utilizing trade policy to support domestic manufacturing and reduce economic dependence on strategic competitors.
Planning for Continued Uncertainty
For manufacturers and distributors, this distinction is important. Election outcomes may influence the magnitude or targeting of future tariffs, but they are unlikely to eliminate the underlying policy trend toward greater scrutiny of imported goods and strategic supply chains. The more relevant business question may therefore be how organizations position themselves for continued uncertainty rather than which party ultimately controls Congress.
In that regard, the events of 2025 and 2026 have provided a clear lesson. Companies that viewed tariffs as an isolated compliance issue often found themselves reacting to events. Those that treated trade policy as a strategic business risk were generally better positioned to manage sourcing transitions, pricing adjustments, and customer expectations. As the industry approaches 2027, successful manufacturers and distributors will likely continue focusing on supply chain flexibility, sourcing diversification, and contractual mechanisms that allow them to respond quickly to future policy changes.
Looking Ahead
The tariff debate will undoubtedly continue, particularly as election rhetoric intensifies. Nevertheless, the broader direction of travel appears increasingly clear. Tariffs are no longer an episodic trade dispute. They have become a central component of U.S. industrial policy, and manufacturers and distributors should plan accordingly.
If you have any questions, we are here to help. Please do not hesitate to reach out to discuss your specific situation.
This material has been prepared for general, informational purposes only and is not intended to provide, and should not be relied on for, tax, legal or accounting advice. Should you require any such advice, please contact us directly. The information contained herein does not create, and your review or use of the information does not constitute, an accountant-client relationship.
